Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37051 - 37060 of 69109 for he.
Search results 37051 - 37060 of 69109 for he.
State v. Deondre J. Kelley
)(a) (2001-02).[2] He also appeals from the order denying his request for sentence modification. Kelley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7420 - 2005-03-31
)(a) (2001-02).[2] He also appeals from the order denying his request for sentence modification. Kelley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7420 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 2
because the preliminary hearings at which he failed to appear were scheduled for the same time, and he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34869 - 2011-06-14
because the preliminary hearings at which he failed to appear were scheduled for the same time, and he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34869 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
State v. Linda L. Middaugh
into the parking lot of Larry’s Goodtime Inn, where he observed Middaugh exit her vehicle and approach his squad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7428 - 2017-09-20
into the parking lot of Larry’s Goodtime Inn, where he observed Middaugh exit her vehicle and approach his squad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7428 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
that, after reviewing the case file and speaking with Granberry, he agrees with Attorney Kelly’s conclusion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144168 - 2015-07-05
that, after reviewing the case file and speaking with Granberry, he agrees with Attorney Kelly’s conclusion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144168 - 2015-07-05
William Alexander v. City of Madison
are unconstitutional. He argues that the ordinances violate the public purpose doctrine because (1) the benefits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3107 - 2005-03-31
are unconstitutional. He argues that the ordinances violate the public purpose doctrine because (1) the benefits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3107 - 2005-03-31
State v. James E. Miller
of § 944.20(1)(b)[2], that he exposed his genitals and that he did so publicly. In essence, Miller challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7485 - 2005-03-31
of § 944.20(1)(b)[2], that he exposed his genitals and that he did so publicly. In essence, Miller challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7485 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and acknowledged that Kuranda only learned of the amount when he received his updated trust account statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133777 - 2015-01-28
, and acknowledged that Kuranda only learned of the amount when he received his updated trust account statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133777 - 2015-01-28
State v. Trenton McAdoo
motion. McAdoo argues that the trial court erred in concluding that he had failed to present a fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13311 - 2005-03-31
motion. McAdoo argues that the trial court erred in concluding that he had failed to present a fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13311 - 2005-03-31
Wells Andrew McGiffert v. Frank Carl Rozowski, Jr.
complaint alleges that while a patron at Frankie’s, he accidentally broke a Pabst mirror hanging on the wall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2398 - 2005-03-31
complaint alleges that while a patron at Frankie’s, he accidentally broke a Pabst mirror hanging on the wall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2398 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2 Wotnoske filed a worker’s compensation claim claiming he suffered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698360 - 2023-09-06
of the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2 Wotnoske filed a worker’s compensation claim claiming he suffered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698360 - 2023-09-06