Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37061 - 37070 of 39868 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 37061 - 37070 of 39868 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
perjury by making “a false material statement which the person does not believe to be true.” See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176103 - 2017-09-21
perjury by making “a false material statement which the person does not believe to be true.” See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176103 - 2017-09-21
State v. Danuele M. Johnson
in [them] by statements on this record. The trial court then concluded that the real issue was whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7408 - 2005-03-31
in [them] by statements on this record. The trial court then concluded that the real issue was whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7408 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
interpreted Lewis’s statements to mean that she was in charge of the entire residence. ¶6 Lewis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93594 - 2013-03-04
interpreted Lewis’s statements to mean that she was in charge of the entire residence. ¶6 Lewis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93594 - 2013-03-04
Donivan Molitor v. Rusk County Board of Adjustment
the law. We disagree and affirm the judgment. STATEMENT OF THE CASE ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3053 - 2005-03-31
the law. We disagree and affirm the judgment. STATEMENT OF THE CASE ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3053 - 2005-03-31
Brian C. Painter v. Dentistry Examining Board
). The Board echoes these same statements on this appeal. ¶14 We hold that the Board’s decision to reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5578 - 2005-03-31
). The Board echoes these same statements on this appeal. ¶14 We hold that the Board’s decision to reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5578 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
making those statements, the court still refused to grant Hughes’ request for a self-defense jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995570 - 2025-08-12
making those statements, the court still refused to grant Hughes’ request for a self-defense jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995570 - 2025-08-12
[PDF]
State v. Stacey R. Wilhelm
authorities. The duty to investigate exists regardless of the accused’s admissions or statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6542 - 2017-09-19
authorities. The duty to investigate exists regardless of the accused’s admissions or statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6542 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 31
, pursuant to Wisconsin’s Implied Consent Law, “read aloud to a slumped Mitchell the standard statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531801 - 2022-08-10
, pursuant to Wisconsin’s Implied Consent Law, “read aloud to a slumped Mitchell the standard statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531801 - 2022-08-10
Barbara Doyle v. Ronald A. Arthur
“ANSWER.” It is a one-paragraph statement “den[ying] each and every allegation [of the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13276 - 2005-03-31
“ANSWER.” It is a one-paragraph statement “den[ying] each and every allegation [of the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13276 - 2005-03-31
State v. John Foster Fant
statements regarding the basement reveal that he did not have an actual, subjective expectation of privacy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13116 - 2005-03-31
statements regarding the basement reveal that he did not have an actual, subjective expectation of privacy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13116 - 2005-03-31