Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37071 - 37080 of 43375 for legal seperation.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
not consider arguments not supported by proper legal argument. State v. Flynn, 190 Wis. 2d 31, 39 n.2, 527
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76883 - 2014-09-15

State v. Irving T. Washington
and inadequately supported by legal authority). [6] We do not suggest that it is prudent for the State to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26131 - 2006-08-07

[PDF] State v. Sandra K.T.
not involve the application of undisputed facts to a legal standard. See Green Scapular Crusade, Inc. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10703 - 2017-09-20

WI App 57 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1862 Complete Title of...
deportable, when that was the clear legal result under immigration law. The second prong, prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110005 - 2014-05-27

[PDF] State v. Matthew Gray
conclude that the circuit court examined the relevant facts, applied a proper legal standard and, using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14307 - 2014-09-15

State v. George Reed
as it has a reasonable basis and is made in accordance with accepted legal standards and facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13073 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
with accepted legal standards and the facts of record.” Id. ¶13 In order to secure a new trial based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31119 - 2007-12-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
“a question of law; however, because the trial court’s legal conclusion as to reasonableness is so
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023381 - 2025-10-15

State v. Kristina L. Vogt
that his or her performance was legally insufficient. See State v. Teynor, 141 Wis. 2d 187, 212, 414 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6663 - 2005-03-31

State v. William P. Haessly
a legal question we review independently. See State v. Richer, 174 Wis. 2d 231, 238-39, 496 N.W.2d 66
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6139 - 2005-03-31