Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37081 - 37090 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] Frontsheet
in writing within 20 days of any claim of the attorney predicated on the grounds set forth in sub. (3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105945 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Whitewater Court, Ltd. v. The City of Whitewater
under protest. Their claims for repayment of excessive taxes were denied by the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7339 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
are an attempt to avoid the procedural bar his claim would otherwise face under Escalona. Indeed, his claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=335995 - 2021-02-16

COURT OF APPEALS
to that child is warranted). Samantha S. claims that the trial court erred in three respects, all in connection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101649 - 2013-09-09

COURT OF APPEALS
assaulting Sylindria. He testified he recalled the incident in which Sylindria threw up, but claimed she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51490 - 2010-06-28

Edwin D. Moehagen v. City of Chippewa Falls
court granted the City’s subsequent motion for summary judgment, concluding that the Moehagens’ claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2767 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Douglas J. Miller
claimed that a search warrant was required to allow the State to analyze the blood sample. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3659 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] City of Menasha Public Works v. Kristin J. Erickson
submitted a second application for a hearing claiming that her condition had improved and Menasha had
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10677 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Patrick A. Saunders v. Gary McCaughtry
of the phone conversations and Saunders’s own admissions undercut this claim. The transcript clearly shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13988 - 2014-09-15

State v. Anthony L. Gipson
the statements inadmissible. The State claims that the trial court erred when it granted the motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3148 - 2005-03-31