Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37081 - 37090 of 38468 for t's.
Search results 37081 - 37090 of 38468 for t's.
State v. John W. Kelley
The relevant language of the dam permit provides that "[t]he dam will be operated with normal head of 11.5 feet
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17507 - 2005-03-31
The relevant language of the dam permit provides that "[t]he dam will be operated with normal head of 11.5 feet
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17507 - 2005-03-31
State v. Aaron T. Hicks
, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Aaron T. Hicks, Defendant-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3473 - 2005-03-31
, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Aaron T. Hicks, Defendant-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3473 - 2005-03-31
State v. Arden C. Hirsch
of the findings and that “[t]his is injury, period.” ¶31 On March 22, 2000, the jury found Hirsch guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3466 - 2005-03-31
of the findings and that “[t]his is injury, period.” ¶31 On March 22, 2000, the jury found Hirsch guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3466 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Pamela L. Peters
found that: [T]he person who is appearing in court today is the wife of the ex-husband of Patricia
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16573 - 2017-09-21
found that: [T]he person who is appearing in court today is the wife of the ex-husband of Patricia
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16573 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert D. Moss
residence on the night of his arrest. The court stated that “[t]he fact that someone stays overnight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3436 - 2005-03-31
residence on the night of his arrest. The court stated that “[t]he fact that someone stays overnight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3436 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Aaron T. Hicks
. AARON T. HICKS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3473 - 2017-09-20
. AARON T. HICKS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3473 - 2017-09-20
State v. Frank M. Ruszkiewicz
, Ruszkiewicz restated the argument he had made at the preliminary hearing, contending that “[t]he bruises, et
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15485 - 2005-03-31
, Ruszkiewicz restated the argument he had made at the preliminary hearing, contending that “[t]he bruises, et
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15485 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard Dodson
concluded, “[T]he prior acts involving the alleged victim in this case also have greater probative value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10793 - 2017-09-20
concluded, “[T]he prior acts involving the alleged victim in this case also have greater probative value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10793 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Robert M. v. City of Franklin
The majority writes that “[t]he crux of the Strzelecs’ negligence claim against the municipal defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2619 - 2017-09-19
The majority writes that “[t]he crux of the Strzelecs’ negligence claim against the municipal defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2619 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 145
that “[t]his is not a rash decision.” Rhodes stated that he had not been threatened or promised anything
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72010 - 2014-09-15
that “[t]his is not a rash decision.” Rhodes stated that he had not been threatened or promised anything
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72010 - 2014-09-15