Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3711 - 3720 of 58458 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Kionta L. Crockett
denying his motion for resentencing. The issue is whether the trial court imposed an unduly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20603 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
claims that the contempt finding arising from December 1, 2005, should be dismissed because the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27383 - 2006-12-11

COURT OF APPEALS
to withdraw his plea based on the ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. We reject Brown’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85491 - 2012-07-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a prison sentence with the length left to the trial court’s discretion and to take no position on whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192933 - 2017-09-21

State v. Harold R. Altenburg
. The State appeals a postconviction order granting Harold R. Altenburg a new trial. The trial court set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10690 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Leigh A. Pedretti
substance contrary to §§ 161.41(3r) and 161.50(1), STATS. Pedretti contends on appeal that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12028 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kionta L. Crockett
a postconviction order denying his motion for resentencing. The issue is whether the trial court imposed an unduly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20603 - 2005-12-12

[PDF] NOTICE
December 1, 2005, should be dismissed because the trial court failed to afford him an opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27383 - 2014-09-15

State v. Stanley Hess
for postconviction relief. Hess raises two issues for review: (1) whether the trial court erred by not permitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10591 - 2005-03-31

Cindy A. Boelter v. Kay C. Bagstad
, and an order finding her in contempt for failing to do so. On appeal, Bagstad contends that: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15611 - 2005-03-31