Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3711 - 3720 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 3711 - 3720 of 58492 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
with a child in violation of § 948.06(1).[2] Following a three-day trial, a jury found Conley guilty of all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41276 - 2009-10-29
with a child in violation of § 948.06(1).[2] Following a three-day trial, a jury found Conley guilty of all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41276 - 2009-10-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
trial, a jury found Conley guilty of all counts. On June 29, 2006, the trial court sentenced Conley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41276 - 2014-09-15
trial, a jury found Conley guilty of all counts. On June 29, 2006, the trial court sentenced Conley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41276 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
terminating her parental rights to Josh, a child born in 2020, on the basis that her trial attorney provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920348 - 2025-02-26
terminating her parental rights to Josh, a child born in 2020, on the basis that her trial attorney provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920348 - 2025-02-26
COURT OF APPEALS
to withdraw his plea based on the ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. We reject Brown’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85491 - 2012-07-30
to withdraw his plea based on the ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. We reject Brown’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85491 - 2012-07-30
[PDF]
Kathy Jo Strittmater v. Dale P. Strittmater
and Roggensack, JJ. PER CURIAM. Kathy Jo Kramer appeals from the trial court’s judgment divorcing her from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13545 - 2017-09-21
and Roggensack, JJ. PER CURIAM. Kathy Jo Kramer appeals from the trial court’s judgment divorcing her from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13545 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles Johnson
a postconviction order denying his resentencing motion.[1] The issue is whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21022 - 2006-01-23
a postconviction order denying his resentencing motion.[1] The issue is whether the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21022 - 2006-01-23
[PDF]
State v. Charles Johnson
2 from a postconviction order denying his resentencing motion.1 The issue is whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21022 - 2017-09-21
2 from a postconviction order denying his resentencing motion.1 The issue is whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21022 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Leigh A. Pedretti
substance contrary to §§ 161.41(3r) and 161.50(1), STATS. Pedretti contends on appeal that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12028 - 2017-09-21
substance contrary to §§ 161.41(3r) and 161.50(1), STATS. Pedretti contends on appeal that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12028 - 2017-09-21
Cindy A. Boelter v. Kay C. Bagstad
, and an order finding her in contempt for failing to do so. On appeal, Bagstad contends that: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15611 - 2005-03-31
, and an order finding her in contempt for failing to do so. On appeal, Bagstad contends that: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15611 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Alil Azizi
also appeals from an order moving the trial court to recuse itself from the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8987 - 2017-09-19
also appeals from an order moving the trial court to recuse itself from the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8987 - 2017-09-19