Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3711 - 3720 of 21316 for warrants.
Search results 3711 - 3720 of 21316 for warrants.
CA Blank Order
the execution of a search warrant, the police seized Read’s computer and cell phone, which contained multiple
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95627 - 2013-04-22
the execution of a search warrant, the police seized Read’s computer and cell phone, which contained multiple
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95627 - 2013-04-22
[PDF]
Harrison D. Kern v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners for the City of Milwaukee
, believe that a demotion is warranted in this case. It has been brought to our attention that, prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12280 - 2017-09-21
, believe that a demotion is warranted in this case. It has been brought to our attention that, prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12280 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, was denied. ¶3 In August 1996, Commissioner Brooks signed an arrest warrant for Rowell, who was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123553 - 2017-09-21
, was denied. ¶3 In August 1996, Commissioner Brooks signed an arrest warrant for Rowell, who was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123553 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
warranting the proposed modification.” Rohde-Giovanni v. Baumgart, 2004 WI 27, ¶30, 269 Wis. 2d 598, 676 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35057 - 2008-12-29
warranting the proposed modification.” Rohde-Giovanni v. Baumgart, 2004 WI 27, ¶30, 269 Wis. 2d 598, 676 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35057 - 2008-12-29
State v. Charles Jasper, Jr.
warranting sentence modification. We affirm. I. Background ¶2 Jasper was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2440 - 2005-03-31
warranting sentence modification. We affirm. I. Background ¶2 Jasper was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2440 - 2005-03-31
State v. Prentiss L. Farr
the sentences to run concurrently. Farr also argued that new factors warranted sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8974 - 2005-03-31
the sentences to run concurrently. Farr also argued that new factors warranted sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8974 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Kons
is warranted because the nontestimonial portions of the June 24 video testimony was not edited out when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8127 - 2005-03-31
is warranted because the nontestimonial portions of the June 24 video testimony was not edited out when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8127 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and of waking a judge to obtain a warrant. There was conflicting evidence at the suppression hearing on how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47247 - 2010-02-22
and of waking a judge to obtain a warrant. There was conflicting evidence at the suppression hearing on how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47247 - 2010-02-22
State v. Henry J. Brookshire
facts to warrant the appointment of a new attorney for an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9258 - 2005-03-31
facts to warrant the appointment of a new attorney for an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9258 - 2005-03-31
State v. Owen Andrew Kreinus
. This motion claimed that a new factor warranted resentencing—namely, that Kreinus was willing to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17754 - 2005-04-18
. This motion claimed that a new factor warranted resentencing—namely, that Kreinus was willing to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17754 - 2005-04-18