Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37101 - 37110 of 75032 for judgment for us.
Search results 37101 - 37110 of 75032 for judgment for us.
[PDF]
NOTICE
construing his motion. Because Perez’s motion was filed more than two years after judgment was entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60547 - 2014-09-15
construing his motion. Because Perez’s motion was filed more than two years after judgment was entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60547 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.23(3). Raymond Edward Seidl appeals a judgment of conviction for operating while
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762492 - 2024-02-14
. RULE 809.23(3). Raymond Edward Seidl appeals a judgment of conviction for operating while
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762492 - 2024-02-14
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: sarah b. o’brien, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57605 - 2010-12-08
a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: sarah b. o’brien, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57605 - 2010-12-08
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51937 - 2010-07-13
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51937 - 2010-07-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
. KURT J. KEUKEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35000 - 2014-09-15
. KURT J. KEUKEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35000 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
two years after judgment was entered, it was untimely. We therefore affirm. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60547 - 2011-02-28
two years after judgment was entered, it was untimely. We therefore affirm. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60547 - 2011-02-28
Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
her motion for mistrial; (2) denying her motion for judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2355 - 2005-03-31
her motion for mistrial; (2) denying her motion for judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2355 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
her motion for mistrial; (2) denying her motion for judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2356 - 2005-03-31
her motion for mistrial; (2) denying her motion for judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2356 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Reinhard R. Gellert, pro se, appeals from a judgment convicting him of felony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243521 - 2019-07-17
. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Reinhard R. Gellert, pro se, appeals from a judgment convicting him of felony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243521 - 2019-07-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denied. Maddox then filed a direct appeal, and we affirmed the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86885 - 2014-09-15
denied. Maddox then filed a direct appeal, and we affirmed the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86885 - 2014-09-15