Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37111 - 37120 of 64954 for or b.
Search results 37111 - 37120 of 64954 for or b.
State v. Kevin E. Daugherty
. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) and (b). The subsequent judgment recited a conviction for OWI, second offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25256 - 2006-05-23
. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) and (b). The subsequent judgment recited a conviction for OWI, second offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25256 - 2006-05-23
Frontsheet
, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer, in violation of SCR 20:8.4(b). Specifically, the basis for that private
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84685 - 2012-07-09
, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer, in violation of SCR 20:8.4(b). Specifically, the basis for that private
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84685 - 2012-07-09
COURT OF APPEALS
, there was no ineffective assistance of counsel. B. O’Boyle entered his plea knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107713 - 2014-02-03
, there was no ineffective assistance of counsel. B. O’Boyle entered his plea knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107713 - 2014-02-03
COURT OF APPEALS
within the 3rd degree of kinship. (b) When a judge is a party or a material witness, except that a judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59234 - 2011-01-24
within the 3rd degree of kinship. (b) When a judge is a party or a material witness, except that a judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59234 - 2011-01-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
omitted.)). No. 2023AP440 8 B. The trial court properly exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756250 - 2024-01-30
omitted.)). No. 2023AP440 8 B. The trial court properly exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756250 - 2024-01-30
State v. Gregory M. Sanders
no information as to the “veracity” and “basis of knowledge” of the citizen informant, and (b) it contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13814 - 2005-03-31
no information as to the “veracity” and “basis of knowledge” of the citizen informant, and (b) it contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13814 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the MEB and had “committed unprofessional conduct as defined by Wis. Admin. Code § MED 10.02(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59949 - 2011-02-15
of the MEB and had “committed unprofessional conduct as defined by Wis. Admin. Code § MED 10.02(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59949 - 2011-02-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) (“This court will not address undeveloped arguments.”). B. Denial of Modification Motion ¶14 Schroeder’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665431 - 2023-06-07
) (“This court will not address undeveloped arguments.”). B. Denial of Modification Motion ¶14 Schroeder’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=665431 - 2023-06-07
COURT OF APPEALS
at 44-45 (quoting State v. Strege, 116 Wis. 2d 477, 485-86, 343 N.W.2d 100). “[B]efore the matter can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111764 - 2014-05-06
at 44-45 (quoting State v. Strege, 116 Wis. 2d 477, 485-86, 343 N.W.2d 100). “[B]efore the matter can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111764 - 2014-05-06
[PDF]
WI APP 171
State v. Smith, 202 Wis. 2d 21, 25-26, 549 N.W.2d 232 (1996) (WIS. STAT. § 971.08(1)(b) requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34188 - 2014-09-15
State v. Smith, 202 Wis. 2d 21, 25-26, 549 N.W.2d 232 (1996) (WIS. STAT. § 971.08(1)(b) requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34188 - 2014-09-15