Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37131 - 37140 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 37131 - 37140 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Goodenough argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199518 - 2017-10-31
appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Goodenough argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199518 - 2017-10-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pornography and sexual exploitation of a child, as well as the denial of his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467481 - 2021-12-28
pornography and sexual exploitation of a child, as well as the denial of his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=467481 - 2021-12-28
State v. Bernard E. Burgess
and ordered him to pay a $5000 fine.[2] Burgess also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3279 - 2005-03-31
and ordered him to pay a $5000 fine.[2] Burgess also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3279 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David L. Reynolds
his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied effective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10315 - 2017-09-20
his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied effective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10315 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
’ initial appearance, the trial court’s pretrial ruling denying Hicks’ motion to enter a letter purportedly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109537 - 2014-03-20
’ initial appearance, the trial court’s pretrial ruling denying Hicks’ motion to enter a letter purportedly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109537 - 2014-03-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ summary judgment motion—and apparently relied upon the summary judgment materials for the dual purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88840 - 2014-09-15
’ summary judgment motion—and apparently relied upon the summary judgment materials for the dual purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88840 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Soulier
to WIS. STAT. §§ 940.19(6), 940.20(2) and 946.41(1). 1 Soulier also appeals the denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6917 - 2017-09-20
to WIS. STAT. §§ 940.19(6), 940.20(2) and 946.41(1). 1 Soulier also appeals the denial of his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6917 - 2017-09-20
Graeme J. Paxton v. Vulcan Basement Waterproofing Company of Wisconsin, Inc.
the production of the policy. On March 20, 1998, the Paxtons filed a motion to compel production
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15379 - 2005-03-31
the production of the policy. On March 20, 1998, the Paxtons filed a motion to compel production
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15379 - 2005-03-31
Donald F. Konle v. Donald G. Page
returns for the same years. Page filed a motion to compel Konle to produce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10364 - 2005-03-31
returns for the same years. Page filed a motion to compel Konle to produce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10364 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the first of two motions for summary judgment seeking a judgment of foreclosure based on the allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180574 - 2017-09-21
the first of two motions for summary judgment seeking a judgment of foreclosure based on the allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180574 - 2017-09-21