Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37141 - 37150 of 83221 for case code.
Search results 37141 - 37150 of 83221 for case code.
[PDF]
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
2002 WI App 248 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-2810
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4505 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 248 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-2810
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4505 - 2017-09-19
Robert Meixelsperger v. Debbra L. Meixelsperger
factors as the court may in each individual case determine to be relevant.” Relevant evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12816 - 2005-03-31
factors as the court may in each individual case determine to be relevant.” Relevant evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12816 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jovan T. Mull
continuing course of conduct. See id. at ¶28. In the instant case, to convict Mull of three offenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4632 - 2017-09-19
continuing course of conduct. See id. at ¶28. In the instant case, to convict Mull of three offenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4632 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In this timber trespass case, the circuit court concluded that Chad and Heidi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88870 - 2014-09-15
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. In this timber trespass case, the circuit court concluded that Chad and Heidi
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88870 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Kienbaum’s arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This is the second time this case is before us. Kienbaum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1094141 - 2026-03-25
Kienbaum’s arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This is the second time this case is before us. Kienbaum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1094141 - 2026-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 48.415(2). In the grounds phase, Nancy M. waived her right to trial by jury, and the case proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108051 - 2014-02-12
. § 48.415(2). In the grounds phase, Nancy M. waived her right to trial by jury, and the case proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108051 - 2014-02-12
[PDF]
WI 16
Petitions for Review - Granted Case Number: Caption: Disposition: Date: 2022AP001728 Heather Gudex v
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=951433 - 2025-05-22
Petitions for Review - Granted Case Number: Caption: Disposition: Date: 2022AP001728 Heather Gudex v
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=951433 - 2025-05-22
[PDF]
State v. Tammy M.
to represent Tammy in these matters. Later, the two cases were consolidated and a jury trial was scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15910 - 2017-09-21
to represent Tammy in these matters. Later, the two cases were consolidated and a jury trial was scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15910 - 2017-09-21
WI App 98 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1776-CR Complete Title...
2013 WI App 98 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1776-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99397 - 2013-08-29
2013 WI App 98 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1776-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99397 - 2013-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
upon.” The court elicited from Smith that he had proceeded in the federal system in a habeas case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30124 - 2007-08-29
upon.” The court elicited from Smith that he had proceeded in the federal system in a habeas case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30124 - 2007-08-29