Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37151 - 37160 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 37151 - 37160 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
judgment sentencing him after revocation of his probation and an order denying his motion to reinstate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61128 - 2014-09-15
judgment sentencing him after revocation of his probation and an order denying his motion to reinstate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61128 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
First Bank (N.A.) v. Russell Cleary
a cause of action based on the note, there was no motion to amend before the court. Presumably
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9802 - 2017-09-19
a cause of action based on the note, there was no motion to amend before the court. Presumably
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9802 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
properly denied Rauch’s motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a traffic stop; (2) whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150697 - 2017-09-21
properly denied Rauch’s motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a traffic stop; (2) whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150697 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
1, 2007, the defendant filed a post-conviction motion claiming he had been deprived of the effective
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35710 - 2009-03-02
1, 2007, the defendant filed a post-conviction motion claiming he had been deprived of the effective
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35710 - 2009-03-02
State v. Mai Lee Vue
was not completely understanding the proceedings. The trial court denied Vue's motion because Vue had never told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8798 - 2005-03-31
was not completely understanding the proceedings. The trial court denied Vue's motion because Vue had never told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8798 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Allen P. Tappa v. Gregory T. Barutha
-2- motion and dismissing his action. Because an issue of fact exists regarding whether the named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8375 - 2017-09-19
-2- motion and dismissing his action. Because an issue of fact exists regarding whether the named
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8375 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Shawn D. Knapp
judgments and a postconviction order denying his motion for resentencing. The issue is whether Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7753 - 2017-09-19
judgments and a postconviction order denying his motion for resentencing. The issue is whether Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7753 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
will be evaluated upon [Kitelinger’s] motion.” ¶3 In April of 2008, Kitelinger moved to have McCauley held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35928 - 2014-09-15
will be evaluated upon [Kitelinger’s] motion.” ¶3 In April of 2008, Kitelinger moved to have McCauley held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35928 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Shepski argues the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42966 - 2009-11-02
and an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Shepski argues the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42966 - 2009-11-02
State v. Cori E. Jeffers
whether to lift the stay. Jeffers filed several documents that the court construed to be a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13107 - 2005-03-31
whether to lift the stay. Jeffers filed several documents that the court construed to be a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13107 - 2005-03-31