Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37151 - 37160 of 57165 for id.

[PDF] State v. Michael A. Maldonado
in the affirmative.5 Id. at 349, 204 N.W.2d at 486. In Wold, the prosecutor was under an obligation to disclose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11713 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
431, 904 N.W.2d 93. No. 2022AP330-CR 9 erroneous[.]” Id. “[W]hether counsel’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632790 - 2023-03-16

COURT OF APPEALS
if the defendant has failed to show prejudice and vice versa. Id. at 697. ¶33 Conley’s first ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41276 - 2009-10-29

[PDF] Heritage Credit Union v. Office of Credit Unions
regarding the interpretation of the statute. Id. at 286. Under the great weight standard, we uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3299 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Bernell L. Ross, Sr.
whether purposeful discrimination has been established.” Id. In this exercise, the accused may show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4829 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Brew City Redevelopment Group, LLC v. The Ferchill Group
of the obligor. Such an agreement is known as a novation. Id., 133 Wis. 2d at 244–245, 395 N.W.2d at 173–174
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21368 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
. 3 Id. at 576-77. The court acknowledged that the statute “if literally applied would invalidate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3514 - 2017-09-19

Stanley W. Anderson v. The Regents of the University of California
). The motion raises a question of law which we review de novo. Id. We liberally construe the pleading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8642 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to be bound by the declaration and bylaws as they may be amended from time to time. Id., ¶17. Turning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131487 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Stanley W. Anderson v. The Regents of the University of California
-7- raises a question of law which we review de novo. Id. We liberally construe the pleading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8642 - 2017-09-19