Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37151 - 37160 of 83088 for simple case search.
Search results 37151 - 37160 of 83088 for simple case search.
State v. Odell Fisher
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1764-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10994 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1764-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10994 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CR 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=847793 - 2024-09-10
-CR 2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=847793 - 2024-09-10
[PDF]
State v. Thomas W. Koeppen
of conditions has no evidentiary value. Moreover, the bond in this case required Koeppen to submit to “orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2760 - 2017-09-19
of conditions has no evidentiary value. Moreover, the bond in this case required Koeppen to submit to “orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2760 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“effectively, six years, in bringing this suit” without an excuse. ¶8 The primary case on which Bukovic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139858 - 2017-09-21
“effectively, six years, in bringing this suit” without an excuse. ¶8 The primary case on which Bukovic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139858 - 2017-09-21
State v. Albert E. Morrow
The case proceeded to trial. Officer Riestra and the citizen were the only witnesses for the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21740 - 2006-03-13
The case proceeded to trial. Officer Riestra and the citizen were the only witnesses for the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21740 - 2006-03-13
[PDF]
JK Harris Financial Recovery Systems, LLC v. Department of Financial Institutions
2006 WI APP 107 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP631
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25038 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 107 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP631
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25038 - 2017-09-21
Lee R. Krahenbuhl, DDS v. Wisconsin Dentistry Examining Board
2006 WI App 73 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP1376
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24556 - 2006-04-25
2006 WI App 73 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP1376
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24556 - 2006-04-25
WI App 29 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP185 Complete Title of ...
2012 WI App 29 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP185 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78033 - 2012-03-27
2012 WI App 29 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP185 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78033 - 2012-03-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
cases. Onyemachi objected on grounds that joinder would be unduly prejudicial. The trial court ruled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=905663 - 2025-01-28
cases. Onyemachi objected on grounds that joinder would be unduly prejudicial. The trial court ruled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=905663 - 2025-01-28
[PDF]
State v. Albert E. Morrow
correspondence related to this file indicates the case is being decided by a three-judge panel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21740 - 2017-09-21
correspondence related to this file indicates the case is being decided by a three-judge panel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21740 - 2017-09-21