Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37161 - 37170 of 37897 for d's.

State v. Jack W. Klubertanz
on the assault.”). I would not address an unbriefed issue. See e.g., In Interest of Christopher D., 191 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24502 - 2006-04-25

[PDF] State v. Antonio McAfee
, that they were a product of irrationality. D. Final Argument. ¶35 Lastly, McAfee claims trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18213 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 94
to or infected with a contagious or infectious disease. (d) Knowingly misrepresent that an animal has not been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32754 - 2014-09-15

2007 WI APP 163
and Matthew Keyes, d/b/a “Keyes to Design, Inc.,” entered into a written contract with James and Rose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29384 - 2007-07-24

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
by Richard D. Martin, assistant state public defender. For the plaintiff-respondent the cause
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17515 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. Further, their claim that the legislature unfairly “unsettle[d] expectations that they reasonably relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53874 - 2010-09-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that ‘the Court ha[d] already endorsed’ the proposition that juvenile offenders under the age of 16 are less
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=560883 - 2022-08-30

State v. William G. Johnson
that the defendant committed acts A, B, and C; other jurors may find that the defendant committed acts D, E, and F
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17564 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
unsuccessful. See 25 U.S.C. § 1912(d) & (f); WIS. STAT. § 48.028(4)(e). It is the first of these two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85106 - 2014-09-15

State v. Mario Santiago Sanchez
are substantially similar, and are to be interpreted identically. See, e.g., Reginald D. v. State, 193 Wis. 2d 299
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16897 - 2005-03-31