Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37171 - 37180 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 37171 - 37180 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
CA Blank Order
. Sangolden E. Gilbert appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95329 - 2013-04-16
. Sangolden E. Gilbert appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95329 - 2013-04-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pro se postconviction motions while represented by appointed counsel. The first sought to vacate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164158 - 2017-09-21
pro se postconviction motions while represented by appointed counsel. The first sought to vacate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164158 - 2017-09-21
Waterford Bank v. Kevin J. Kimball
pursuant to the bank's motion for summary judgment. Because we conclude that factual issues exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10116 - 2005-03-31
pursuant to the bank's motion for summary judgment. Because we conclude that factual issues exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10116 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frank S. Smith
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that the trial court erroneously instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that the trial court erroneously instructed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher A. Knapp
court erred in denying Knapp's suppression motion and in sentencing him. We conclude the court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8162 - 2005-03-31
court erred in denying Knapp's suppression motion and in sentencing him. We conclude the court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8162 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
motion for resentencing. He argues that the sentencing court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112729 - 2014-05-18
motion for resentencing. He argues that the sentencing court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112729 - 2014-05-18
[PDF]
State v. Joseph P. Buchholz
in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized in a search of his dormitory room. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4161 - 2017-09-20
in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized in a search of his dormitory room. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4161 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
. Nelson’s motion to dismiss was denied. Nelson does not dispute that the State presented adequate evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95649 - 2013-04-15
. Nelson’s motion to dismiss was denied. Nelson does not dispute that the State presented adequate evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95649 - 2013-04-15
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment sentencing him after revocation of his probation and an order denying his motion to reinstate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61128 - 2011-03-14
judgment sentencing him after revocation of his probation and an order denying his motion to reinstate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61128 - 2011-03-14
[PDF]
State v. Michael G. Ehlers
Ehlers' motion to suppress. On appeal, the State asserts on the basis of State v. Wille, 185 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8897 - 2017-09-19
Ehlers' motion to suppress. On appeal, the State asserts on the basis of State v. Wille, 185 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8897 - 2017-09-19