Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37171 - 37180 of 83948 for case search.
Search results 37171 - 37180 of 83948 for case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
answered “yes” to that question. In the context of the current case, the jury could have answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155574 - 2017-09-21
answered “yes” to that question. In the context of the current case, the jury could have answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155574 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
The facts in this case are not contested. We review whether those facts meet the constitutional standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123499 - 2014-10-08
The facts in this case are not contested. We review whether those facts meet the constitutional standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123499 - 2014-10-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to his initial case. These cases were consolidated for a jury trial, where Glidden was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840483 - 2024-08-21
to his initial case. These cases were consolidated for a jury trial, where Glidden was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840483 - 2024-08-21
[PDF]
State v. Jonathan Owens
2006 WI APP 75 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 2005AP1850-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21652 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 75 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 2005AP1850-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21652 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150292 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150292 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290215 - 2020-09-23
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290215 - 2020-09-23
[PDF]
Kimberly K. Larsen v. School District of Rhinelander
failed to meet the requirements of § 893.80, STATS., as it has been interpreted in case law.3 Instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12997 - 2017-09-21
failed to meet the requirements of § 893.80, STATS., as it has been interpreted in case law.3 Instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12997 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of mediation, he explained to Mitchell his case had a value of between $150,000 and $200,000. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174203 - 2017-09-21
of mediation, he explained to Mitchell his case had a value of between $150,000 and $200,000. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174203 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
incorrectly—that the Menzer case was a read-in. ¶3 Uitz filed a postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88170 - 2012-10-15
incorrectly—that the Menzer case was a read-in. ¶3 Uitz filed a postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88170 - 2012-10-15
Certification
violates the Wisconsin Constitution’s marriage amendment. Specifically, this case presents the question
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84445 - 2012-07-04
violates the Wisconsin Constitution’s marriage amendment. Specifically, this case presents the question
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84445 - 2012-07-04