Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37171 - 37180 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 37171 - 37180 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Kevin D.K.
that the evidence presented at trial was so insufficient in probative value and force that, as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3990 - 2017-09-20
that the evidence presented at trial was so insufficient in probative value and force that, as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3990 - 2017-09-20
Marathon County v. Faye P.
this court addresses without deference to the trial court's determination. In re Jason R.N., 201 Wis.2d 646
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9604 - 2005-03-31
this court addresses without deference to the trial court's determination. In re Jason R.N., 201 Wis.2d 646
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9604 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James T. Carey, Jr. v. Ted Swiontek, Sr.
for summary judgment set forth in § 802.08, STATS., in the same manner as does the trial court, and we owe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11072 - 2017-09-19
for summary judgment set forth in § 802.08, STATS., in the same manner as does the trial court, and we owe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11072 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ralanda Nicole Lee
home were in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and, therefore, the trial court erred in denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11879 - 2005-03-31
home were in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and, therefore, the trial court erred in denying her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11879 - 2005-03-31
Traditional Design Works, Ltd. v. John McGourthy, Jr.
the trial court’s order. The following facts are undisputed. In August 1992, TDW and the McGourthys entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13064 - 2005-03-31
the trial court’s order. The following facts are undisputed. In August 1992, TDW and the McGourthys entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13064 - 2005-03-31
Griffin & Brand of McAllen, Inc. v. Richard H. Gumz
confirming sale of real estate subsequent to a mortgage foreclosure judgment. He claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10710 - 2005-03-31
confirming sale of real estate subsequent to a mortgage foreclosure judgment. He claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10710 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
without a reasonable belief that a person is entitled to do so.” The trial court granted summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29356 - 2007-06-11
without a reasonable belief that a person is entitled to do so.” The trial court granted summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29356 - 2007-06-11
[PDF]
State v. Mary Boyer
). The trial court deferred entry of judgment pursuant to § 161.47, STATS.1 The State contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8718 - 2017-09-19
). The trial court deferred entry of judgment pursuant to § 161.47, STATS.1 The State contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8718 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
interviews; (3) denying Johnson’s motion for a continuance of the trial; (4) allowing the prosecutor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248717 - 2019-10-16
interviews; (3) denying Johnson’s motion for a continuance of the trial; (4) allowing the prosecutor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248717 - 2019-10-16
[PDF]
Carol Gonzales v. Kenosha County
for an erroneous exercise of discretion. “A trial court’s decision to grant leave to amend a complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20892 - 2017-09-21
for an erroneous exercise of discretion. “A trial court’s decision to grant leave to amend a complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20892 - 2017-09-21