Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37181 - 37190 of 68502 for did.
Search results 37181 - 37190 of 68502 for did.
State v. Harold W. Johnson
was illegal because the officer making the stop did not have reasonable suspicion that Johnson had violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14682 - 2005-03-31
was illegal because the officer making the stop did not have reasonable suspicion that Johnson had violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14682 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of what elements were explained to Cruz did not mention the purpose of the sexual contact, we required
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103800 - 2013-11-05
of what elements were explained to Cruz did not mention the purpose of the sexual contact, we required
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103800 - 2013-11-05
State v. Keith A. Brouwer
had been drinking. Brouwer responded that he had consumed four beers but stated that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19952 - 2005-10-18
had been drinking. Brouwer responded that he had consumed four beers but stated that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19952 - 2005-10-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
requirement did not apply and the police lacked a reasonable suspicion to believe that she was under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453148 - 2021-11-16
requirement did not apply and the police lacked a reasonable suspicion to believe that she was under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453148 - 2021-11-16
[PDF]
State v. Sameeh J. Pickens
are satisfied that it did not penalize the defendant based on any improper factors, and that its balance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15631 - 2017-09-21
are satisfied that it did not penalize the defendant based on any improper factors, and that its balance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15631 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
deals with “sentence adjustment.” No. 2011AP2775-CR 3 time’ that the sentencing court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88942 - 2014-09-15
deals with “sentence adjustment.” No. 2011AP2775-CR 3 time’ that the sentencing court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88942 - 2014-09-15
Peters & Vanden Heuvel v. Richard Vanden Heuvel
for reconsideration motions under § 805.17(3), Stats. Vanden Heuvel reasons that he did not file a timely notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14575 - 2005-03-31
for reconsideration motions under § 805.17(3), Stats. Vanden Heuvel reasons that he did not file a timely notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14575 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
this court because Phillips did not petition for leave to appeal the circuit court’s bond decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35190 - 2014-09-15
this court because Phillips did not petition for leave to appeal the circuit court’s bond decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35190 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Amanda Earl v. Milwaukee Transport Service, Inc.
testified that Earl complained of pain in her right hand but that he did not have objective data to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9902 - 2017-09-19
testified that Earl complained of pain in her right hand but that he did not have objective data to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9902 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). ¶3 We have carefully perused the record. The trial court did not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34728 - 2014-09-15
, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). ¶3 We have carefully perused the record. The trial court did not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34728 - 2014-09-15