Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37191 - 37200 of 57351 for id.
Search results 37191 - 37200 of 57351 for id.
[PDF]
State v. Luis G. Flores
is not entitled to withdraw the plea because the court failed to inform him of these consequences. Id. at 371
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4685 - 2017-09-19
is not entitled to withdraw the plea because the court failed to inform him of these consequences. Id. at 371
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4685 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. We review de novo whether a defendant has been denied this right. Id. In a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=284711 - 2020-09-09
. We review de novo whether a defendant has been denied this right. Id. In a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=284711 - 2020-09-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
facts satisfy the constitutional standard of probable cause. Id., ¶10. After reviewing the video
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74247 - 2014-09-15
facts satisfy the constitutional standard of probable cause. Id., ¶10. After reviewing the video
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74247 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of fact will not be reversed unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. Whether counsel’s conduct violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164835 - 2017-09-21
of fact will not be reversed unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. Whether counsel’s conduct violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164835 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Spencer Hutchinson v. Robert Buckley
. Id. at 273. ¶7 The trial court thoroughly examined all of the relevant facts in concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3652 - 2017-09-19
. Id. at 273. ¶7 The trial court thoroughly examined all of the relevant facts in concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3652 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
that a copy of the writ is filed ‘forthwith.’” Id., at 416 (emphasis in original). As this court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56175 - 2014-09-15
that a copy of the writ is filed ‘forthwith.’” Id., at 416 (emphasis in original). As this court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56175 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
restriction such as building height, setback, and so forth….” Id., ¶23. ¶3 In a May 21, 2008 decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61129 - 2014-09-15
restriction such as building height, setback, and so forth….” Id., ¶23. ¶3 In a May 21, 2008 decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61129 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Donald C. Brown v. Gary R. McCaughtry
was such that the committee might No. 97-1766 4 reasonably make the order or determination in question. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12636 - 2017-09-21
was such that the committee might No. 97-1766 4 reasonably make the order or determination in question. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12636 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Elaine Veasley
court, however, presents a matter for independent appellate review. Id. Further, “whether a seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8636 - 2017-09-19
court, however, presents a matter for independent appellate review. Id. Further, “whether a seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8636 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
performance. See id., ¶39; see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). To prove
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010504 - 2025-09-17
performance. See id., ¶39; see also Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). To prove
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010504 - 2025-09-17