Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3721 - 3730 of 29827 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. (emphasis added). ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346241 - 2021-03-16

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
and review de novo the grant or denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89924 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jody Mayo
that we should review the trial court’s decision de novo because it presents a “constitutional question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14583 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment de novo, independently of the circuit court, applying the same methodology. AccuWeb, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143539 - 2015-06-24

All City Communication Company, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue
three distinct levels of deference: great weight, due weight, and de novo review.” MCI Telecomms. Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5222 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] David M. Bliss v. Wisconsin Retirement Board
conclusions of law de novo when the case is one of first impression. Kelley Co. v. Marquardt, 172 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12583 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of the underinsured motorist coverage.” DISCUSSION Standard of Review ¶8 Our review of a summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110073 - 2014-04-08

Milwaukee Police Association v. City of Milwaukee
of this appeal were decided on summary judgment and present only issues of law. Accordingly, our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13002 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, where relevant to our analysis. DISCUSSION ¶13 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482148 - 2022-02-08

COURT OF APPEALS
on a motion for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Tensfeldt v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47351 - 2010-02-24