Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3721 - 3730 of 68326 for did.
Search results 3721 - 3730 of 68326 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the repeater portion of his sentence should be vacated because the State did not prove the prior conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173630 - 2017-09-21
that the repeater portion of his sentence should be vacated because the State did not prove the prior conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173630 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Warren Viergutz v. Marvin Kraut
contend that the trial court did not have the authority to accept an extension of the redemption period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14626 - 2017-09-21
contend that the trial court did not have the authority to accept an extension of the redemption period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14626 - 2017-09-21
State v. Karen A.O.
of the children did not make a diligent effort to provide the services ordered by the court as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10929 - 2005-03-31
of the children did not make a diligent effort to provide the services ordered by the court as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10929 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Chad E. Lamberies
. Lamberies asserts that he did not validly waive his constitutional right to an attorney in that case. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20539 - 2017-09-21
. Lamberies asserts that he did not validly waive his constitutional right to an attorney in that case. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20539 - 2017-09-21
State v. Chad E. Lamberies
intoxicated. Lamberies asserts that he did not validly waive his constitutional right to an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20539 - 2005-12-05
intoxicated. Lamberies asserts that he did not validly waive his constitutional right to an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20539 - 2005-12-05
[PDF]
State v. Karen A.O.
Karen argues that: (1) the agency responsible for the care of the children did not make a diligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10931 - 2017-09-20
Karen argues that: (1) the agency responsible for the care of the children did not make a diligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10931 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Carlton Maruki Jones
. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when it sentenced Jones, and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17664 - 2017-09-21
. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when it sentenced Jones, and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17664 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael J. Corey
. On appeal, Corey argues that his refusal was not improper because the officer did not have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14717 - 2005-03-31
. On appeal, Corey argues that his refusal was not improper because the officer did not have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14717 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
,” she did not “believe” that she “search[ed] underneath the bed.” Her report indicated that she
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431563 - 2021-09-29
,” she did not “believe” that she “search[ed] underneath the bed.” Her report indicated that she
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431563 - 2021-09-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
shows that Griswold did not actually enter or use either of the two study rooms in the library
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=278345 - 2020-08-13
shows that Griswold did not actually enter or use either of the two study rooms in the library
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=278345 - 2020-08-13