Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3721 - 3730 of 83414 for simple case search.
Search results 3721 - 3730 of 83414 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. Marion Jones
and searched, there was no reasonable basis to stop her a second time absent new information to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15022 - 2017-09-21
and searched, there was no reasonable basis to stop her a second time absent new information to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15022 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
by the State in this case [was] not a search warrant and thus, the attachment of a GPS device to [Pinder's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227193 - 2019-03-06
by the State in this case [was] not a search warrant and thus, the attachment of a GPS device to [Pinder's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227193 - 2019-03-06
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added oral argument dates for April, 2013; order in case no. 2011AP414
February 13, 2013 WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT TABLE OF PENDING CASES Clerk of Supreme
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92914 - 2014-09-15
February 13, 2013 WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT TABLE OF PENDING CASES Clerk of Supreme
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92914 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Tomas R. Payano-Roman
States v. Adekunle, 980 F.2d 985, 990 (5th Cir. 1992), for the proposition that the search in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18072 - 2017-09-21
States v. Adekunle, 980 F.2d 985, 990 (5th Cir. 1992), for the proposition that the search in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18072 - 2017-09-21
State v. Tomas R. Payano-Roman
that the search administered in this case was unreasonable and violative of Payano-Roman’s Fourth Amendment rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18072 - 2005-07-06
that the search administered in this case was unreasonable and violative of Payano-Roman’s Fourth Amendment rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18072 - 2005-07-06
[PDF]
State v. Ahmad Abdullah
) and 161.41(1m)(h)(1), STATS. Abdullah challenges the warrantless search of his home. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11544 - 2017-09-19
) and 161.41(1m)(h)(1), STATS. Abdullah challenges the warrantless search of his home. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11544 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ahmad Abdullah
search of his home. We affirm. On the night of January 2, 1996, Milwaukee County police officers were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11544 - 2005-03-31
search of his home. We affirm. On the night of January 2, 1996, Milwaukee County police officers were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11544 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
warrantless search. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 The facts as testified to at the suppression hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102150 - 2017-09-21
warrantless search. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 The facts as testified to at the suppression hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102150 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to an unlawful warrantless search. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 The facts as testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102150 - 2013-09-24
to an unlawful warrantless search. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 The facts as testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102150 - 2013-09-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758891 - 2024-02-08
. We conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=758891 - 2024-02-08