Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3721 - 3730 of 84252 for simple case search/1000.

[PDF] State v. Luis E. Bermudez
items won’t be disturbed.” According to Cavalary, Lisa then consented to the search. In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12241 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the circuit court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence that was discovered during a search
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=819712 - 2024-07-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the circuit court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence that was discovered during a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=819712 - 2024-07-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that challenges to the evidence in this case were connected to the other, more serious, charges he was facing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231776 - 2019-01-08

[PDF] State v. Nathan T. Moore
in similar situations. From this, Moore reasons that the search in this case was more of the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7447 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. William F. Williams
that simple. Counsel then informed the court that there was therefore no plea agreement, and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15307 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] John W. Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel Inc.
in the record in a defamation case is of the convincing clarity required to strip the utterance of First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8948 - 2017-09-19

John W. Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel Inc.
case is of the convincing clarity required to strip the utterance of First Amendment protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8948 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John W. Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel, Inc.
in the record in a defamation case is of the convincing clarity required to strip the utterance of First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9322 - 2017-09-19

John W. Torgerson v. Journal/Sentinel, Inc.
case is of the convincing clarity required to strip the utterance of First Amendment protection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9322 - 2005-03-31