Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3721 - 3730 of 58492 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
claims that the contempt finding arising from December 1, 2005, should be dismissed because the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27383 - 2006-12-11

[PDF] Cindy A. Boelter v. Kay C. Bagstad
, and an order finding her in contempt for failing to do so. On appeal, Bagstad contends that: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15611 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to withdraw his plea based on the ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. We reject Brown’s argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85491 - 2014-09-15

State v. Alil Azizi
-degree sexual assault of a child. He also appeals from an order moving the trial court to recuse itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8987 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
December 1, 2005, should be dismissed because the trial court failed to afford him an opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27383 - 2014-09-15

State v. Charles Jones
, and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3374 - 2005-03-31

State v. Leigh A. Pedretti
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in denying his request for a continuance of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12028 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Alil Azizi
also appeals from an order moving the trial court to recuse itself from the postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8987 - 2017-09-19

State v. Harold R. Altenburg
. The State appeals a postconviction order granting Harold R. Altenburg a new trial. The trial court set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10690 - 2005-03-31

Cindy A. Boelter v. Kay C. Bagstad
, and an order finding her in contempt for failing to do so. On appeal, Bagstad contends that: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15611 - 2005-03-31