Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37201 - 37210 of 58507 for speedy trial.

Schams Joint Revocable Trust by David F. Schams v. William M. Evans
] Neither party disputes that when a trial court is sitting in equity—as it is in an action to quiet title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14841 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶3 After a trial to the court, the court rejected both theories. The court concluded that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33186 - 2008-06-25

COURT OF APPEALS
omitted). “Whether to declare a mistrial is directed to the trial court’s discretion.” State v. Hampton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31007 - 2007-11-28

Wendy Enright v. Pleasant View LTD Partnerships
., for failing to return the full amount of the deposit. After a bench trial, the circuit court awarded Enright
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14948 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
886. Thus, Miller could only claim that his trial counsel was ineffective for not filing the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119151 - 2014-08-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
’ settlement with Chubb was irrelevant to the interpretation of the Assurance policy. ¶4 A bifurcated trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219328 - 2018-09-26

COURT OF APPEALS
, and one count of causing injury by intoxicated use. He entered a no contest plea after the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35374 - 2009-01-28

[PDF] Wisconsin Department of Transportation v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
unsatisfactory. The trial court's construction of sec. 32.28, STATS., if carried to its logical conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11677 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
have just gone to trial on that basis. She says it didn’t happen.” Athas’s trial lawyer responded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97994 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
that a different result would be reached in a trial.” Id. ¶4 Hashim contends that his “no contest [plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66673 - 2011-06-28