Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37221 - 37230 of 69084 for as he.
Search results 37221 - 37230 of 69084 for as he.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513148 - 2022-04-27
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=513148 - 2022-04-27
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that because he was found indigent under the criteria set forth in Wis. Stat. § 814.29, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72311 - 2011-10-17
contends that because he was found indigent under the criteria set forth in Wis. Stat. § 814.29, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72311 - 2011-10-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and became stuck. As officers attempted to arrest him, he managed to free his vehicle and flee again
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608708 - 2023-01-10
and became stuck. As officers attempted to arrest him, he managed to free his vehicle and flee again
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608708 - 2023-01-10
State v. Allen L.
is invalid because he was not provided the warnings required by Wis. Stat. § 48.356. We reject Allen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2776 - 2005-03-31
is invalid because he was not provided the warnings required by Wis. Stat. § 48.356. We reject Allen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2776 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motions for plea withdrawal in two Pierce County criminal cases. Close contends that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619564 - 2023-02-07
postconviction motions for plea withdrawal in two Pierce County criminal cases. Close contends that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619564 - 2023-02-07
[PDF]
State v. Juergen Huebner
to property, see § 943.01(1), STATS. He was convicted by a six-person jury, to which he did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14429 - 2017-09-21
to property, see § 943.01(1), STATS. He was convicted by a six-person jury, to which he did not object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14429 - 2017-09-21
State v. Alexander Stocks
-2000).[2] He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5027 - 2005-03-31
-2000).[2] He also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5027 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Evraets
of alcohol. Secor testified that he observed Evraets driving around 1 a.m. Evraets remained stopped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7247 - 2017-09-20
of alcohol. Secor testified that he observed Evraets driving around 1 a.m. Evraets remained stopped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7247 - 2017-09-20
State v. Arthur E. Messick
right to challenge his sentence because he did not object when the trial court ordered conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2578 - 2005-03-31
right to challenge his sentence because he did not object when the trial court ordered conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2578 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
conviction that is invalid because he did not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waive his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33255 - 2008-07-01
conviction that is invalid because he did not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waive his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33255 - 2008-07-01