Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37221 - 37230 of 62306 for child support.
Search results 37221 - 37230 of 62306 for child support.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to suppress, arguing that exigent circumstances did not support the warrantless blood draw. Following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250990 - 2019-12-11
to suppress, arguing that exigent circumstances did not support the warrantless blood draw. Following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250990 - 2019-12-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an extension of the deadline for doing so supported by good cause. We warned Webster that by failing to file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137501 - 2017-09-21
an extension of the deadline for doing so supported by good cause. We warned Webster that by failing to file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137501 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
against Reschke was supported by an 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96411 - 2014-09-15
against Reschke was supported by an 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96411 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert M. Hipke
fact, subject to our de novo review. Id. ¶7 Hipke asserts that the stop was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7604 - 2017-09-19
fact, subject to our de novo review. Id. ¶7 Hipke asserts that the stop was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7604 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was arbitrary and not supported by substantial evidence in the record. After reviewing the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101976 - 2017-09-21
was arbitrary and not supported by substantial evidence in the record. After reviewing the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101976 - 2017-09-21
John Jelks v. Philip Arreola
to supporting his denial of access to the subject criminal investigation file.” Accordingly, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8434 - 2005-03-31
to supporting his denial of access to the subject criminal investigation file.” Accordingly, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8434 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
substantial evidence to support this finding. See Von Arx v. Schwarz, 185 Wis. 2d 645, 656, 517 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=776174 - 2024-03-14
substantial evidence to support this finding. See Von Arx v. Schwarz, 185 Wis. 2d 645, 656, 517 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=776174 - 2024-03-14
Town of Madison v. Randall E. Gartland
factual basis existed to support the circuit court’s finding. Because the circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3530 - 2005-03-31
factual basis existed to support the circuit court’s finding. Because the circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3530 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark G. Bargenquast
the alphabet properly, which he does not contest. However, he disputes that the HGN test supports probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14543 - 2005-03-31
the alphabet properly, which he does not contest. However, he disputes that the HGN test supports probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14543 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Galindo presented no medical evidence or expert opinion to support his assertion that he was addicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60795 - 2011-03-07
Galindo presented no medical evidence or expert opinion to support his assertion that he was addicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60795 - 2011-03-07