Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37221 - 37230 of 65831 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 37221 - 37230 of 65831 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his request to adjourn the resentencing hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314394 - 2020-12-15
his request to adjourn the resentencing hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314394 - 2020-12-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
not supported by evidence in the record. For example, the court stated the stop occurred near the “darkest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35353 - 2014-09-15
not supported by evidence in the record. For example, the court stated the stop occurred near the “darkest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35353 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of records.” ¶5 Sallis testified: � She made “three fake appointments for 6:00, 6:15, and 6:30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84242 - 2014-09-15
of records.” ¶5 Sallis testified: � She made “three fake appointments for 6:00, 6:15, and 6:30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84242 - 2014-09-15
State v. Abdullah Refeeq Beyah
). The only evidence in the record supporting coercive conduct by the police is Beyah's testimony. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10432 - 2005-03-31
). The only evidence in the record supporting coercive conduct by the police is Beyah's testimony. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10432 - 2005-03-31
2006 WI APP 242
it makes a statement on the record detailing its reasons for “selecting the particular sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26627 - 2006-11-20
it makes a statement on the record detailing its reasons for “selecting the particular sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26627 - 2006-11-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, there was not a sufficient factual basis to support that Gierczak obstructed an officer because the record did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90589 - 2012-12-12
, there was not a sufficient factual basis to support that Gierczak obstructed an officer because the record did not establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90589 - 2012-12-12
[PDF]
State v. Brian J. Dorsey
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief, the trial court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18503 - 2017-09-21
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief, the trial court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18503 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In reviewing this record, we rely upon Seiler’s second amended motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117675 - 2017-09-21
. In reviewing this record, we rely upon Seiler’s second amended motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117675 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Lonkoski. The interrogation was video-recorded. ¶3 Wood informed Lonkoski that he was not under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76553 - 2012-01-17
Lonkoski. The interrogation was video-recorded. ¶3 Wood informed Lonkoski that he was not under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76553 - 2012-01-17
[PDF]
State v. Michael T. Schmaling
the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record. No. 94-3041-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8281 - 2017-09-19
the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record. No. 94-3041-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8281 - 2017-09-19