Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37231 - 37240 of 64954 for or b.
Search results 37231 - 37240 of 64954 for or b.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
guilty pleas, as required by § 971.08(1)(b); and (3) determine his understanding of the rights that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98794 - 2014-09-15
guilty pleas, as required by § 971.08(1)(b); and (3) determine his understanding of the rights that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98794 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Anthony J. Randle
. STAT. § 939.03. B. Territorial Jurisdiction. ¶17 Next, Randle contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4020 - 2017-09-20
. STAT. § 939.03. B. Territorial Jurisdiction. ¶17 Next, Randle contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4020 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
a warrantless blood draw following Cain’s arrest. See Repenshek, 277 Wis. 2d 780, ¶¶15-17 (“[B]lood may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61362 - 2011-03-16
a warrantless blood draw following Cain’s arrest. See Repenshek, 277 Wis. 2d 780, ¶¶15-17 (“[B]lood may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61362 - 2011-03-16
Racine County Human Services Department v. Lakisha G.
reasons: (a) Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (b) Newly-discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7013 - 2005-03-31
reasons: (a) Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (b) Newly-discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7013 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. §§ 941.30(1) & 939.63(1)(b) (2009-10).[2] Jefferson also appeals the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83975 - 2012-06-25
. Stat. §§ 941.30(1) & 939.63(1)(b) (2009-10).[2] Jefferson also appeals the order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83975 - 2012-06-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
: [B]efore trial [trial counsel] told you the elements of both the withdrawal defense and the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31794 - 2014-09-15
: [B]efore trial [trial counsel] told you the elements of both the withdrawal defense and the party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31794 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
WIS. STAT. § 901.03(1)(b) (“Error may not be predicated upon a ruling which … excludes evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=568807 - 2022-09-22
WIS. STAT. § 901.03(1)(b) (“Error may not be predicated upon a ruling which … excludes evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=568807 - 2022-09-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. These are proper considerations when determining whether a deviation is warranted. See § 767.511(1m)(b), (e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263950 - 2020-06-09
. These are proper considerations when determining whether a deviation is warranted. See § 767.511(1m)(b), (e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263950 - 2020-06-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a correctional institution.” WIS. STAT. § 302.1135(1)(b). At a hearing on the petition, the inmate has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105841 - 2017-09-21
a correctional institution.” WIS. STAT. § 302.1135(1)(b). At a hearing on the petition, the inmate has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105841 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the reservation, (b) all dependent Indian communities within the borders of the United States whether within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541218 - 2022-07-06
the reservation, (b) all dependent Indian communities within the borders of the United States whether within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541218 - 2022-07-06