Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37241 - 37250 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 37241 - 37250 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Kevin H. Gillson
to the questioning. He contends that the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress those statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13341 - 2005-03-31
to the questioning. He contends that the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress those statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13341 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his motion to collaterally attack his prior OWI conviction in Minnesota. Because Devinney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26653 - 2006-10-02
an order denying his motion to collaterally attack his prior OWI conviction in Minnesota. Because Devinney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26653 - 2006-10-02
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
her motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. Knotts contends the warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28281 - 2007-03-05
her motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. Knotts contends the warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28281 - 2007-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop and that the trial court erred in denying a suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307830 - 2020-11-25
reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop and that the trial court erred in denying a suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307830 - 2020-11-25
CA Blank Order
motion for return of property seized in executing a search warrant. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106013 - 2013-12-19
motion for return of property seized in executing a search warrant. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106013 - 2013-12-19
COURT OF APPEALS
on claims by creditors; maintenance will be evaluated upon [Kitelinger’s] motion.” ¶3 In April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35928 - 2009-03-18
on claims by creditors; maintenance will be evaluated upon [Kitelinger’s] motion.” ¶3 In April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35928 - 2009-03-18
Waterford Bank v. Kevin J. Kimball
pursuant to the bank's motion for summary judgment. Because we conclude that factual issues exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10116 - 2010-01-25
pursuant to the bank's motion for summary judgment. Because we conclude that factual issues exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10116 - 2010-01-25
Town of Barton v. Division of Hearings and Appeals
its motion with affidavits averring that the town board never authorized a judicial review proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2524 - 2012-08-20
its motion with affidavits averring that the town board never authorized a judicial review proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2524 - 2012-08-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
will be evaluated upon [Kitelinger’s] motion.” ¶3 In April of 2008, Kitelinger moved to have McCauley held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35928 - 2014-09-15
will be evaluated upon [Kitelinger’s] motion.” ¶3 In April of 2008, Kitelinger moved to have McCauley held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35928 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
attorney, James Gatzke, filed a motion for relief from the scheduling order. He sought more time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191779 - 2017-09-21
attorney, James Gatzke, filed a motion for relief from the scheduling order. He sought more time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191779 - 2017-09-21