Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37251 - 37260 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 37251 - 37260 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issue is whether his No. 2023AP1792-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846458 - 2024-09-06
and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issue is whether his No. 2023AP1792-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846458 - 2024-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was to grant Rubbelke’s pretrial motion in limine. The State did not No. 2022AP1122-CRNM 3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723960 - 2023-11-07
was to grant Rubbelke’s pretrial motion in limine. The State did not No. 2022AP1122-CRNM 3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723960 - 2023-11-07
Waterford Bank v. Kevin J. Kimball
pursuant to the bank's motion for summary judgment. Because we conclude that factual issues exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10116 - 2005-03-31
pursuant to the bank's motion for summary judgment. Because we conclude that factual issues exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10116 - 2005-03-31
County of Waukesha v. Gene W. Squire
the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence. We conclude that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3549 - 2005-03-31
the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence. We conclude that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3549 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ed Cody, Jr. v. Michael Weygandt
to answer within thirty days, Cody filed a motion for summary judgment. In response to the summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20084 - 2017-09-21
to answer within thirty days, Cody filed a motion for summary judgment. In response to the summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20084 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Shawn D. Knapp
judgments and a postconviction order denying his motion for resentencing. The issue is whether Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7753 - 2017-09-19
judgments and a postconviction order denying his motion for resentencing. The issue is whether Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7753 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop and that the trial court erred in denying a suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307830 - 2020-11-25
reasonable suspicion for the traffic stop and that the trial court erred in denying a suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307830 - 2020-11-25
COURT OF APPEALS
on claims by creditors; maintenance will be evaluated upon [Kitelinger’s] motion.” ¶3 In April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35928 - 2009-03-18
on claims by creditors; maintenance will be evaluated upon [Kitelinger’s] motion.” ¶3 In April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35928 - 2009-03-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was to grant Rubbelke’s pretrial motion in limine. The State did not No. 2022AP1122-CRNM 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723960 - 2023-11-07
was to grant Rubbelke’s pretrial motion in limine. The State did not No. 2022AP1122-CRNM 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723960 - 2023-11-07
State v. Steven Warner
newspapers printed follow-up articles noting the judge's concerns. As a result, Warner brought motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7953 - 2005-03-31
newspapers printed follow-up articles noting the judge's concerns. As a result, Warner brought motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7953 - 2005-03-31