Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37261 - 37270 of 50524 for our.

[PDF] NOTICE
not rely on a conclusion that Swope killed his parents when it sentenced him. Because our independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30171 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2019AP445-CR 2 conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291889 - 2020-09-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
findings about counsel’s representation unless they are clearly erroneous, and we do not substitute our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258636 - 2020-05-08

State v. Marcus A. Farina
“at the time that a chemical test specimen is requested.” Wis. Stat. § 343.305(4). Our supreme court has held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2422 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Gary T. Mork
as a sub silentio holding that we think each is true. Rather, our holding in this case renders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5530 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
erratic driving behavior on the part of police, the citizen should not be penalized. ¶4 We start our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28030 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
be no arguable merit to a challenge to the sentencing court’s discretion. Our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92215 - 2013-01-24

State v. Eric A. Paarmann
and the evidence established Messina’s purpose for the trip, does not undermine our confidence in the outcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13294 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
with that language. ¶13 As our summary above demonstrates, the court did not inform the jury that the exhibits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74288 - 2011-11-22

CA Blank Order
is so excessive as to shock public sentiment. See Ocanas, 70 Wis. 2d at 185. Our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140534 - 2015-04-28