Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37271 - 37280 of 68202 for law.

Lou Emma Hale v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
the interpretation of an insurance policy, and, therefore, presents a question of law that we review without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3950 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
of the Kinseys’ claims must fail as a matter of law. In response, the Kinseys argued that material issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29624 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] George Harrison v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
a question of law which is subject to de novo review. See Preloznik v. City of Madison, 113 Wis.2d 112
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11010 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Miya L.A.
” if he or she “has violated any state or federal criminal law”); § 48.12(1), STATS. (with exceptions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11088 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Wendy S. DeHart v. Wisconsin Mutual Insurance Company
and Lance Trollop of The Law Office of Christine Bremer & Associates, S.C., Wausau. Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25229 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James E. Powell
the facts of record and the law relied upon. Hartung v. Hartung, 102 Wis.2d 58, 66, 306 N.W.2d 16, 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9474 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of reasonable suspicion is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Martwick, 2000 WI 5, ¶19, 231 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402470 - 2021-07-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law for our independent review. State v. Tulley, 2001 WI App 236, ¶5, 248 Wis. 2d 505, 635
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103706 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Luz O.
. Construction of a statute presents a question of law, and this court owes no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7329 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
if the circuit court “examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and using a demonstrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103342 - 2013-10-23