Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37271 - 37280 of 65130 for or b.

CA Blank Order
. Stat. §§ 948.03(2)(b), 948.03(3)(a), and 948.21(1)(b) (2009-10).[1] She also appeals from an order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103349 - 2013-10-21

State v. Tom Sweeney
for reversal of the conviction on grounds that (a) his trial counsel was ineffective and, alternatively, (b) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10475 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. § 939.62(1)(b) and § 943.38(2) (2005-06),[1] and sentencing her to six years in prison, consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34444 - 2008-11-04

Frontsheet
, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer, in violation of SCR 20:8.4(b). Specifically, the basis for that private
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84685 - 2012-07-09

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
Nissenbaum’s complaint with prejudice under Wis. Stat. Rules 802.10(5)(b) and 801.01(2). II. A. Expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28466 - 2007-03-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 17, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of ...
unprofessional errors.” See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. B. Failing to Adequately Communicate with Carson. ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101921 - 2013-09-16

COURT OF APPEALS
sexual assault of Danielle based on jury findings of only two separate assaults. He contends that “[b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33940 - 2008-09-09

[PDF] State v. Eric Jason Smiley
. 1992). B. Admission of Drugs and Gun Evidence. ¶11 Smiley claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3586 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are not persuaded that Yancey is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on this claim. B. Lab Analyst ¶13 In his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859303 - 2024-10-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
its burden. ¶11 In sections B and C below, we examine the City’s arguments. But, before doing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63999 - 2014-09-15