Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3731 - 3740 of 6256 for cf.

[PDF] State v. Winnebago County
. See Snyder v. Waukesha County Zoning Bd. of Adj., 74 Wis.2d 468, 475, 247 N.W.2d 98, 102 (1976); cf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8338 - 2017-09-19

State v. Roger P. Barber
intent when he touched the screen. Cf. State v. Plymesser, 172 Wis.2d 583, 593, 493 N.W.2d 367, 372
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13448 - 2008-01-16

Oneida County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
that the statute is ambiguous. In the absence of ambiguity, we do not refer to legislative history. Cf. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2280 - 2009-04-19

Kip D. Erickson v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
legislature has seen fit to let the statutory language, as applied by LIRC, stand. Cf. A.B.C.G. Enters., Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19152 - 2005-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
witnessed Marcella Kolodziej or either of the endorsers sign the note. Cf. Forbus v. City of LaCrosse, 21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60974 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Moreover, the totality of the other trial evidence amply supported the convictions. Cf. Kourtidias, 206
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168205 - 2017-09-21

State v. Gary L. Parson
to prove that people were saying these things. Cf. id. The fact that people on the street were saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11953 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
are not persuaded by the Nelsons’ reliance on Broderick. Cf. Haines v. Haines, 39 Cal. Rptr. 2d 673, 683 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45163 - 2009-12-29

Jay W. Smith v. Paul Katz
at the time of the sale, and only occurred much later." Petitioner's brief at 25. [6] But Cf. Kremers-Urban
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17135 - 2013-09-24

Carla B. v. Timothy N.
is incapable of performance and that visitation has been effectively prohibited by court order. Cf. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15327 - 2005-03-31