Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3731 - 3740 of 83994 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 3731 - 3740 of 83994 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
consent to search the car." The State noted the concession, stating "[t]his case is not about
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116898 - 2017-09-21
consent to search the car." The State noted the concession, stating "[t]his case is not about
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116898 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Shaun E. Kelley
to that dictate, one of which is presented in this case―a warrantless search is constitutionally permissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18776 - 2017-09-21
to that dictate, one of which is presented in this case―a warrantless search is constitutionally permissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18776 - 2017-09-21
State v. Shaun E. Kelley
in this case―a warrantless search is constitutionally permissible where consent to search has been granted. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18776 - 2005-09-19
in this case―a warrantless search is constitutionally permissible where consent to search has been granted. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18776 - 2005-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joshua Ferry
illegality associated with the first search. The primary concern in attenuation cases is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8288 - 2017-09-19
illegality associated with the first search. The primary concern in attenuation cases is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8288 - 2017-09-19
2008 WI APP 154
to a parolee. However, both parties agree that the focus of the analysis in this case is on whether the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34133 - 2011-06-14
to a parolee. However, both parties agree that the focus of the analysis in this case is on whether the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34133 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
WI APP 154
parties agree that the focus of the analysis in this case is on whether the search was valid under State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34133 - 2014-09-15
parties agree that the focus of the analysis in this case is on whether the search was valid under State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34133 - 2014-09-15
State v. Glenn F. Schwebke
Schwebke's petition for review. Schwebke argues that his case presents more than a simple question
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17580 - 2005-03-31
Schwebke's petition for review. Schwebke argues that his case presents more than a simple question
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17580 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Glenn F. Schwebke
for review. Schwebke argues that his case presents more than a simple question of whether the evidence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17580 - 2017-09-21
for review. Schwebke argues that his case presents more than a simple question of whether the evidence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17580 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 17
there to conduct a search.” Id. ¶13 The parties all agree that Jardines controls in this case and invalidates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107211 - 2017-09-21
there to conduct a search.” Id. ¶13 The parties all agree that Jardines controls in this case and invalidates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107211 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
2008 WI App 176 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP1850-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34570 - 2008-12-16
2008 WI App 176 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP1850-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34570 - 2008-12-16