Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3731 - 3740 of 20975 for word.

[PDF] Appeal No. 2007AP1877-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2004CF2137
a telephone is to use electricity, and the trial court itself never used those words in its orders denying
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34640 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
about that” and answered each of her questions with the word “mute.” Ridgway interpreted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143432 - 2015-06-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
common, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially defined words or phrases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=549631 - 2022-07-28

[PDF] Dane County v. James S.
words, a “fact-finding” hearing at which “unfitness is … one of the things that will be gone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13914 - 2014-09-15

U.S. Bank National Association v. City of Milwaukee
). Obeisance to legislative intent is so important that we may even insert words in a statute when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6279 - 2005-03-31

Madison Gas and Electric Company v. Department of Revenue
is ambiguous, we determine legislative intent from the words of the statute in relation to its context, subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14395 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 7
not had significant difficulties with [h]is back before the June 1993 accident.” In other words, Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=317184 - 2021-02-08

[PDF] State v. Paul Venema
, it was impossible for him to wear “two hats.” In other words, Venema argued that he could not have had a private
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4386 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Madison Gas and Electric Company v. Department of Revenue
determine legislative intent from the words of the statute in relation to its context, subject matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14395 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
the word No. 2006AP1295 5 “estate” on the beneficiary form had been a mistake, and Robert had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28766 - 2014-09-15