Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37301 - 37310 of 66083 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 37301 - 37310 of 66083 for motion to dismiss.
COURT OF APPEALS
version of events. The circuit court denied Nixon’s motion without an evidentiary hearing as it found she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102981 - 2013-10-15
version of events. The circuit court denied Nixon’s motion without an evidentiary hearing as it found she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102981 - 2013-10-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for appellate costs and attorney fees. We affirm the judgment and deny Marla’s motion. ¶2 Robert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148662 - 2017-09-21
for appellate costs and attorney fees. We affirm the judgment and deny Marla’s motion. ¶2 Robert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148662 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
from orders denying his motions for postconviction relief and for reconsideration. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74190 - 2011-11-21
from orders denying his motions for postconviction relief and for reconsideration. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74190 - 2011-11-21
[PDF]
State v. Jerod J. Bins
12, 1999, Bins pro se filed a “Motion and Supporting Affidavit for the Transcription of the Trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4061 - 2017-09-20
12, 1999, Bins pro se filed a “Motion and Supporting Affidavit for the Transcription of the Trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4061 - 2017-09-20
State v. Rufus P. West
) motion for postconviction relief.[1] The trial court summarily denied West’s claims under State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6361 - 2005-03-31
) motion for postconviction relief.[1] The trial court summarily denied West’s claims under State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6361 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motions for postconviction relief and for reconsideration. We conclude that the issues Fowler raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74190 - 2014-09-15
motions for postconviction relief and for reconsideration. We conclude that the issues Fowler raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74190 - 2014-09-15
State v. James Darius Jones
an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2001-02)[1] motion. Jones claims he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6561 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2001-02)[1] motion. Jones claims he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6561 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
supported her version of events. The circuit court denied Nixon’s motion without an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102981 - 2017-09-21
supported her version of events. The circuit court denied Nixon’s motion without an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102981 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159290 - 2017-09-21
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159290 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, pro se, appeals an order that denied his motion for postconviction relief. Upon consideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012102 - 2025-09-23
, pro se, appeals an order that denied his motion for postconviction relief. Upon consideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1012102 - 2025-09-23