Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37331 - 37340 of 68202 for law.

State v. John C. Johnson
completed on the highway was not a violation of the traffic laws; therefore, the officer did not have either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2276 - 2005-03-31

State v. Andrew Newson
constitute ineffective assistance is a mixed question of law and fact. Thiel, 264 Wis. 2d 571, ¶21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18855 - 2005-07-05

State v. Armando T. Trevino, Jr.
ineffective assistance of counsel is a mixed question of law and fact. See State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11819 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Pam Anita Cook v. Roger Paul Cook
of Briggs Law Office of Madison. Respondent ATTORNEYSFor the petitioner-respondent the cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9384 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Milo S. Couillard v. David H. Schwarz
admitted this to the two mothers, but not to the police. McKenzie did tell law enforcement officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2927 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Micah Oriedo v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
by an agency’s conclusions of law in the same manner as we are by its factual findings. WIS. STAT. § 227.57(5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4059 - 2017-09-20

Paul Johns v. County of Oneida
made by the Johns presents a question of law that we review without deference to the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9776 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of an administrative agency, the law Kline cites is not applicable to this case. As part of this argument, Kline also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135063 - 2015-02-17

COURT OF APPEALS
a defendant has been denied the right to due process is a question of constitutional law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31561 - 2008-01-22

COURT OF APPEALS
question of fact and law. Maloney, 281 Wis. 2d 595, ¶15. The trial court’s determination of what counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66544 - 2011-06-28