Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37341 - 37350 of 98406 for court records search online.
Search results 37341 - 37350 of 98406 for court records search online.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
. The court first stated that “[t]he record reveals that during the course of the respondent’s cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28157 - 2007-02-20
. The court first stated that “[t]he record reveals that during the course of the respondent’s cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28157 - 2007-02-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
motion. The court first stated that “[t]he record reveals that during the course of the respondent’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28157 - 2014-09-15
motion. The court first stated that “[t]he record reveals that during the course of the respondent’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28157 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
“when the record of the sentencing hearing demonstrates that the court actually considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51347 - 2014-09-15
“when the record of the sentencing hearing demonstrates that the court actually considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51347 - 2014-09-15
Debra Louise Groff v. Jeffrey Alan Groff
discretion when it divided the property. Our review of the record establishes that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18407 - 2005-06-07
discretion when it divided the property. Our review of the record establishes that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18407 - 2005-06-07
[PDF]
Debra Louise Groff v. Jeffrey Alan Groff
it divided the property. Our review of the record establishes that the court considered the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18407 - 2017-09-21
it divided the property. Our review of the record establishes that the court considered the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18407 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
: The [sentencing] court considered that the defendant did not have a prior record and that he “was a good family
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559204 - 2022-08-30
: The [sentencing] court considered that the defendant did not have a prior record and that he “was a good family
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559204 - 2022-08-30
State v. Matrice L.R.
that discretionary authority. See id. We examine whether the court’s decision is reasonably supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12414 - 2005-03-31
that discretionary authority. See id. We examine whether the court’s decision is reasonably supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12414 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
for resentencing.” The record shows that shortly after that order was entered, the clerk of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34165 - 2014-09-15
for resentencing.” The record shows that shortly after that order was entered, the clerk of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34165 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Lori J. Schroeder
defense. Nor does perusal of the record help. This court is at a loss to consider whether the witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15380 - 2017-09-21
defense. Nor does perusal of the record help. This court is at a loss to consider whether the witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15380 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark Anthony Solorio
on the contentions that the trial court: (1) failed to state on the record factors influencing its decision; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18775 - 2005-07-05
on the contentions that the trial court: (1) failed to state on the record factors influencing its decision; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18775 - 2005-07-05