Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37351 - 37360 of 40043 for financial disclosure statement.

David Barlow v. Board of Police and Fire Commissioners of the City of Madison
occasion. Barlow could not reasonably assume from Amesqua’s statement regarding “simple drug use” that any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20207 - 2005-11-09

[PDF] Brown County Department of Health & Human Services v. Tammy L.W.
). ¶30 At the dispositional hearing, Rick appeared by telephone and made a brief statement in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3592 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
argument regarding probable cause based on the .02 limit consists of general statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110871 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 2 The State asserts in its statement of the case that Taylor’s trial counsel “had no questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252097 - 2020-01-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Winnebago County’s lawyer made improper statements to the jury during the rebuttal closing argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=693559 - 2023-08-23

[PDF] WI APP 137
Lala argues that the supreme court’s statement “mere nudity is not enough” implies nudity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38547 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of thirty-five years of initial confinement to the circuit court’s statement that Walker faced fifty-three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353334 - 2021-04-06

[PDF] Green County Department of Human Services v. David L.
of Desiree Garcia in regard to John H.’s sexual abuse of her, John H.’s admission of abuse, statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3747 - 2017-09-19

State v. Jesse Liukonen
in Williams: I concede that the prosecutor’s statements could be characterized as not enthusiastically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6576 - 2005-03-31

State v. Shawn A. Beasley
,” which the dissent describes as follows: the “usual statement is that if a statute is ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5581 - 2005-03-31