Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37351 - 37360 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 37351 - 37360 of 58547 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Kevin D.K.
that the evidence presented at trial was so insufficient in probative value and force that, as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3990 - 2017-09-20
that the evidence presented at trial was so insufficient in probative value and force that, as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3990 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 480, 736 N.W.2d 530. In this context, “we consider all of the evidence produced at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195745 - 2017-09-21
Wis. 2d 480, 736 N.W.2d 530. In this context, “we consider all of the evidence produced at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195745 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Veronica L. Reiter
"for use as evidence at trial all evidence obtained, directly or indirectly, as a consequence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9359 - 2017-09-19
"for use as evidence at trial all evidence obtained, directly or indirectly, as a consequence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9359 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
United Stone Corporation v. County of Waukesha
as the trial court, and we are not bound by the trial court's ruling. Garcia v. Regent Ins. Co., 167 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9973 - 2017-09-19
as the trial court, and we are not bound by the trial court's ruling. Garcia v. Regent Ins. Co., 167 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9973 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to her parents under a trial reunification. The trial reunification was modified to actual placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210220 - 2018-03-27
to her parents under a trial reunification. The trial reunification was modified to actual placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210220 - 2018-03-27
[PDF]
State v. Jerome P. Wiechert
)(a) & (5), STATS. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11349 - 2017-09-19
)(a) & (5), STATS. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11349 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James H. Bartz
as an “alternative” test was misleading. He further challenges the trial court’s finding that Bartz refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14329 - 2014-09-15
as an “alternative” test was misleading. He further challenges the trial court’s finding that Bartz refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14329 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. Rule 809.19(2)(a) (2007-08).[2] The rule requires the appendix to contain “relevant trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49247 - 2012-10-31
. Stat. Rule 809.19(2)(a) (2007-08).[2] The rule requires the appendix to contain “relevant trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49247 - 2012-10-31
CA Blank Order
with counsel; and (3) his trial counsel was ineffective for not pursuing a question of his competency to stand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132654 - 2015-01-06
with counsel; and (3) his trial counsel was ineffective for not pursuing a question of his competency to stand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132654 - 2015-01-06
State v. Randy S. Simplot
to trial after the trial court denied a suppression motion challenging the search. The jury convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3303 - 2005-03-31
to trial after the trial court denied a suppression motion challenging the search. The jury convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3303 - 2005-03-31