Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37371 - 37380 of 44191 for name change.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to consider a plea offer, Price indicated that he wanted to change his plea and accept the offer which would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82078 - 2014-09-15

Nancy M. White v. Jeffrey A. White
) (construction contract provision requiring written changes may be avoided where the parties evidence an intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2897 - 2005-03-31

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Tara P.
. The language of subsection (2)(c) can now be found at § 48.415(2)(a)3 with few substantive changes. [4] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4588 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
would have changed his approach. Nor does he explain why he chose to waive counsel despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186540 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jackson Electric Cooperative v. Brockway Sanitary District No. 1
that they knew nothing about the change in the status of the USDA loan/grant, or of the resulting need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16116 - 2017-09-21

Rock County Department of Human Services v. Elaine H.
. It is also true that a parent’s circumstances may change after a fact-finding hearing, and new information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7239 - 2005-03-31

Robert Tomaszewski v. David Giera
. Stat. ch. 14, § 4 (1849). However, in 1915, the legislature changed the statute, making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5643 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
harm done to the victim. The victim had to change his employment. He’s scared to even do his job
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78627 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Neil P. Jackson
crime. This paragraph does not apply to a person who voluntarily changes his or her mind
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7558 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Mary G. Sevcik v. Secura Insurance Company
in a misleading manner. They claim that the legislature never intended to change case law holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2880 - 2017-09-19