Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37381 - 37390 of 38899 for c's.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. At that point, Durham threw down an object, later identified as a coat, and “c[a]me at” or “[l]unged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169266 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
right to a speedy trial was not violated.[8] C. The trial court properly denied Franklin’s suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32738 - 2008-05-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. at 408 (“[C]onduct or repetitive acts that are intended to harass or intimidate do not serve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=755274 - 2024-01-25

[PDF] Rhonda Neff v. James Pierzina
(1999) (footnotes omitted). C. Timeliness of Notice ¶49 Our task now is to apply the standard
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17508 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. C. John Doe 3 ¶28 Turning to Doe 3, Coughlin does not challenge that there was ample evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342498 - 2021-03-04

[PDF] State v. Robert L. Von Haden, Jr.
and unfairly prejudicial. c. Failure to request polling of the jury ¶30 After the jury delivered its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7060 - 2017-09-20

2010 WI APP 169
interview. C. While Hampton unambiguously invoked his right to counsel two hours and thirty-eight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56203 - 2010-12-13

[PDF] WI APP 69
not related to PTSD $_____ related to PTSD (not to exceed 16 sessions) $_____ (c) past wage loss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146276 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
Sterling either based upon its comments to the prosecutor or the sentence it imposed. C. Cross-Examination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49634 - 2010-05-03

[PDF] NOTICE
to the Honorable Elsa C. Lamelas on February 27, 2006. ¶3 On July 3, 2006, Orville moved to suppress the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33250 - 2014-09-15