Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37381 - 37390 of 55208 for n c.
Search results 37381 - 37390 of 55208 for n c.
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 974.06(3)(a), (b) and (c) (2003‑04).[2] Because Wagner’s trial attorney was not ineffective, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29963 - 2007-08-13
. § 974.06(3)(a), (b) and (c) (2003‑04).[2] Because Wagner’s trial attorney was not ineffective, his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29963 - 2007-08-13
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jolie M. Semancik
, deceit or misrepresentation, in violation of SCR 20:8.4(c).[4] ¶25 The referee agreed with the OLR's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19955 - 2005-10-13
, deceit or misrepresentation, in violation of SCR 20:8.4(c).[4] ¶25 The referee agreed with the OLR's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19955 - 2005-10-13
COURT OF APPEALS
: sCOTT C. WOLDT, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 GUNDRUM, J.[1] Joshua Hunter appeals from judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138796 - 2015-03-31
: sCOTT C. WOLDT, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 GUNDRUM, J.[1] Joshua Hunter appeals from judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138796 - 2015-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III IN RE THE COMMITMENT OF ROY C. O’NEAL: STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372146 - 2021-06-02
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III IN RE THE COMMITMENT OF ROY C. O’NEAL: STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372146 - 2021-06-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS and DENNIS P. MORONEY, Judges.1 Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31303 - 2014-09-15
for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS and DENNIS P. MORONEY, Judges.1 Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31303 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
)(c). An appeal is frivolous if it “was filed, used or continued in bad faith, solely” to harass
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210579 - 2018-04-04
)(c). An appeal is frivolous if it “was filed, used or continued in bad faith, solely” to harass
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210579 - 2018-04-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: SUZANNE C. O’NEILL, Judge. Affirmed. Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Gill, JJ. Per curiam opinions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=750564 - 2024-01-18
: SUZANNE C. O’NEILL, Judge. Affirmed. Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Gill, JJ. Per curiam opinions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=750564 - 2024-01-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
] a 5 The maximum penalty for second-degree sexual assault of a child, a Class C felony, is forty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190248 - 2017-09-21
] a 5 The maximum penalty for second-degree sexual assault of a child, a Class C felony, is forty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190248 - 2017-09-21
State v. David A. B.
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: GERALD C. NICHOL, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9923 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: GERALD C. NICHOL, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9923 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 18, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appea...
expert testimony that the Buckmasters were not negligent; and (c) excluding John Buckmaster’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50177 - 2010-05-17
expert testimony that the Buckmasters were not negligent; and (c) excluding John Buckmaster’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50177 - 2010-05-17