Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37381 - 37390 of 56178 for so.
Search results 37381 - 37390 of 56178 for so.
State v. Steven Buckingham
fits within a recognized hearsay exception. If not, the evidence must be excluded. If so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12409 - 2005-03-31
fits within a recognized hearsay exception. If not, the evidence must be excluded. If so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12409 - 2005-03-31
WI App 122 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2173-CR Complete Titl...
if the defendant did in fact use the personal identifying information of an individual, so the State must prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129281 - 2014-12-18
if the defendant did in fact use the personal identifying information of an individual, so the State must prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129281 - 2014-12-18
[PDF]
State v. Norman O. Brown
prior to sentencing, so long as the prosecution has not been substantially prejudiced by reliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12714 - 2017-09-21
prior to sentencing, so long as the prosecution has not been substantially prejudiced by reliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12714 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
where the sentence is so excessive and unusual and so disproportionate to the offense committed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114472 - 2017-09-21
where the sentence is so excessive and unusual and so disproportionate to the offense committed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114472 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
may request that witnesses be excluded from the courtroom “so that they cannot hear the testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155646 - 2017-09-21
may request that witnesses be excluded from the courtroom “so that they cannot hear the testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155646 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Margaret Hoffman v. Thomas V. Rankin, M.D.
have us rule that the legislature, without saying so, used two materially distinct definitions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4640 - 2017-09-19
have us rule that the legislature, without saying so, used two materially distinct definitions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4640 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
dangerous.” Id., ¶26 (emphasis added).7 So, the statute does require a showing of current dangerousness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721953 - 2023-11-01
dangerous.” Id., ¶26 (emphasis added).7 So, the statute does require a showing of current dangerousness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721953 - 2023-11-01
COURT OF APPEALS
search of his person. Nelson then had Rogers step out of the vehicle to “find out why he was so nervous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99398 - 2013-07-15
search of his person. Nelson then had Rogers step out of the vehicle to “find out why he was so nervous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99398 - 2013-07-15
CA Blank Order
favorably to the [S]tate and the commitment, is so insufficient in probative value and force that it can
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98463 - 2013-06-19
favorably to the [S]tate and the commitment, is so insufficient in probative value and force that it can
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98463 - 2013-06-19
Richard D. Herr v. State
latitude to § 88.87. We decline to do so, as we know of no statutory or case law giving us such authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25346 - 2006-05-30
latitude to § 88.87. We decline to do so, as we know of no statutory or case law giving us such authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25346 - 2006-05-30