Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37391 - 37400 of 68517 for did.
Search results 37391 - 37400 of 68517 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Meddaugh
). Meddaugh did not revoke his consent, and we conclude that, by operation of law and his submission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3714 - 2017-09-19
). Meddaugh did not revoke his consent, and we conclude that, by operation of law and his submission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3714 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing discretion: (1) when it did not allow the him to show sentences imposed by other circuit courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73387 - 2014-09-15
sentencing discretion: (1) when it did not allow the him to show sentences imposed by other circuit courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73387 - 2014-09-15
State v. Eric J.D.
that two cars and two officers were at the scene, and he testified that he did not feel free to leave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13048 - 2005-03-31
that two cars and two officers were at the scene, and he testified that he did not feel free to leave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13048 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Aguilar
). The charges were related to the evidence adduced at the preliminary hearing and certainly did not lack merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12114 - 2005-03-31
). The charges were related to the evidence adduced at the preliminary hearing and certainly did not lack merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12114 - 2005-03-31
Megal Laundromat, Inc. v. Suds-R-Us, Inc.
did not breach the contract; and (2) that if Suds did breach the contract, the breach was so obvious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15094 - 2005-03-31
did not breach the contract; and (2) that if Suds did breach the contract, the breach was so obvious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15094 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Construction because the claims in the Sextons’ complaint did not allege “property damage” caused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29865 - 2007-07-31
Construction because the claims in the Sextons’ complaint did not allege “property damage” caused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29865 - 2007-07-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2019AP1770-CR 4 withdrawal existed because he did not take his medication on the day he entered his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272858 - 2020-07-28
No. 2019AP1770-CR 4 withdrawal existed because he did not take his medication on the day he entered his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272858 - 2020-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Murray
of counsel because his trial counsel did not inform him of the parole consequences No. 95-2567-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9682 - 2017-09-19
of counsel because his trial counsel did not inform him of the parole consequences No. 95-2567-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9682 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kelly L. McCray
that the Hodges did not want or invite McCray to stay overnight, denied McCray’s motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13046 - 2017-09-21
that the Hodges did not want or invite McCray to stay overnight, denied McCray’s motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13046 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because the trial court did not adequately advise Grant about the sentences he faced due to the penalty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91546 - 2014-09-15
because the trial court did not adequately advise Grant about the sentences he faced due to the penalty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91546 - 2014-09-15