Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3741 - 3750 of 63725 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3741 - 3750 of 63725 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
, while armed, as party to a crime. He moved to suppress the custodial statement. The motion alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64236 - 2011-05-16
, while armed, as party to a crime. He moved to suppress the custodial statement. The motion alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64236 - 2011-05-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
the sentencing objectives (“minimum custody requirements”). The trial court denied the motion, explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48451 - 2014-09-15
the sentencing objectives (“minimum custody requirements”). The trial court denied the motion, explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48451 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
(“minimum custody requirements”). The trial court denied the motion, explaining the specific mitigating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48451 - 2010-03-29
(“minimum custody requirements”). The trial court denied the motion, explaining the specific mitigating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48451 - 2010-03-29
COURT OF APPEALS
of cocaine as party to a crime. Hallet argues the trial court erroneously denied his pretrial motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49114 - 2010-04-19
of cocaine as party to a crime. Hallet argues the trial court erroneously denied his pretrial motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49114 - 2010-04-19
CA Blank Order
motions for additional sentence credit and reconsideration relating to Dane County Case Nos. 2005CF2207
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98602 - 2013-06-24
motions for additional sentence credit and reconsideration relating to Dane County Case Nos. 2005CF2207
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98602 - 2013-06-24
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
., Higginbotham and Kloppenburg, JJ. Terrence Buchanan appeals orders that denied his motions for additional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98602 - 2014-09-15
., Higginbotham and Kloppenburg, JJ. Terrence Buchanan appeals orders that denied his motions for additional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98602 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. This is Procell’s second appeal following his convictions for first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35700 - 2009-03-02
motion. This is Procell’s second appeal following his convictions for first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35700 - 2009-03-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
motion. This is Procell’s 1 All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35700 - 2014-09-15
motion. This is Procell’s 1 All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35700 - 2014-09-15
WI App 52 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1275-CR Complete Title...
and Douglas testified at the evidentiary hearing on Douglas’s motion to suppress. ¶5 Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94202 - 2013-04-23
and Douglas testified at the evidentiary hearing on Douglas’s motion to suppress. ¶5 Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94202 - 2013-04-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
against him, and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33065 - 2014-09-15
against him, and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33065 - 2014-09-15