Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3741 - 3750 of 63301 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3741 - 3750 of 63301 for Motion for joint custody.
C.L. and T.W. (minor) v. The School District of Menomonee Falls
in this action and filed a motion for summary judgment claiming that the allegations against Bauernfeind were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11938 - 2005-03-31
in this action and filed a motion for summary judgment claiming that the allegations against Bauernfeind were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11938 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
C.L. and T.W. (minor) v. The School District of Menomonee Falls
and filed a motion for summary judgment claiming that the allegations against Bauernfeind were criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11938 - 2017-09-21
and filed a motion for summary judgment claiming that the allegations against Bauernfeind were criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11938 - 2017-09-21
Susan M. Oimoen (O'Kane) v. Steven C. Oimoen
of Texas. The Nebraska divorce decree gave legal custody and primary placement of the children to O’Kane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13023 - 2005-03-31
of Texas. The Nebraska divorce decree gave legal custody and primary placement of the children to O’Kane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13023 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Susan M. Oimoen (O'Kane) v. Steven C. Oimoen
but presently is a legal resident of Texas. The Nebraska divorce decree gave legal custody and primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13023 - 2017-09-21
but presently is a legal resident of Texas. The Nebraska divorce decree gave legal custody and primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13023 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
the conviction. ¶2 The issue on review is whether the circuit court erred in denying the defendant's motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31776 - 2008-02-06
the conviction. ¶2 The issue on review is whether the circuit court erred in denying the defendant's motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31776 - 2008-02-06
[PDF]
WI 10
2 ¶2 The issue on review is whether the circuit court erred in denying the defendant's motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31776 - 2014-09-15
2 ¶2 The issue on review is whether the circuit court erred in denying the defendant's motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31776 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in denying a motion to suppress statements he made to law enforcement because the statements were obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868248 - 2024-10-30
in denying a motion to suppress statements he made to law enforcement because the statements were obtained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868248 - 2024-10-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with an arrest warrant requesting extradition because Sandifer was in custody in an adjacent state. On March
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375113 - 2021-06-09
with an arrest warrant requesting extradition because Sandifer was in custody in an adjacent state. On March
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375113 - 2021-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
court denied Brooks’ motions after verdict to change the jury’s answer on informed consent and denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62023 - 2011-03-30
court denied Brooks’ motions after verdict to change the jury’s answer on informed consent and denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62023 - 2011-03-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The circuit court denied Brooks’ motions after verdict to change the jury’s answer on informed consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62023 - 2014-09-15
. The circuit court denied Brooks’ motions after verdict to change the jury’s answer on informed consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62023 - 2014-09-15