Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3741 - 3750 of 59336 for do.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. However, they do not attempt to rebut that argument by pointing to a finding that Bartz was responsible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=859021 - 2024-10-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. 2 To the extent we do not address an issue the Doubledays attempted to raise, we deem those
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906566 - 2025-01-29

State v. Nicholaas P.J. Ligtenberg
a reasonably prudent attorney would do in similar circumstances. Id. at 690, quoted in Pitsch at 636-37
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5919 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey Joseph Dake
of confusing the issues and misleading the jury. Dake’s rights to call witnesses and confront his accuser do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14809 - 2005-03-31

State v. Amado V. Saldana, Jr.
and his expression of remorse. His employment history and support of his children do not make him any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14511 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Michael R. Behr v. Douglas County
, we do not reach these other issues. 2 If the complaint states a claim and the pleadings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9225 - 2017-09-19

Appeal No
]: Andrea, do you understand that issue and … are you willing to stipulate that those things are true
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28235 - 2007-02-27

COURT OF APPEALS
up here. And I’m pleading no contest. I’m just going to ask for mercy. That’s all I’m doing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51998 - 2010-07-12

COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶8 With regard to the runoff emanating from the Sokolskis’ property, the Smarts do not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36102 - 2009-04-07

State v. William Backhaus
all of the warnings on the Informing the Accused form, and because the officer failed to do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9356 - 2005-03-31